edging: has quality cost

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operation
Weight: 0.46
, thing
Weight: 0.45
, maintenance
Weight: 0.39
, accessory
Weight: 0.38
, piece
Weight: 0.38
Siblings victory
Weight: 0.30
, beat
Weight: 0.30
, climbing
Weight: 0.29
, drifting
Weight: 0.29
, touching
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality cost 1.00
has quality good 0.82
has quality bad 0.81
is expensive 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(edging, has quality cost)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(maintenance, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(edging, has quality cost)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(accessory, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(edging, has quality cost)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(piece, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(edging, has quality cost)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(maintenance, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(edging, has quality cost)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(maintenance, has quality cost)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(piece, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(accessory, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(maintenance, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(accessory, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, is expensive)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(piece, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, has quality cost)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beat, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(touching, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(climbing, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(beat, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(beat, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(climbing, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(maintenance, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(edging, has quality cost)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(piece, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(edging, has quality cost)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(edging, has quality cost)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(maintenance, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(edging, has quality cost)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(accessory, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(edging, has quality cost)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(beat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(beat, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(beat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(beat, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(climbing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(climbing, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(touching, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(touching, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(climbing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(climbing, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(beat, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(beat, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(edging, has quality cost)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(edging, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(edging, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(edging, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(edging, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(edging, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(edging, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(edging, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(edging, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(edging, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(edging, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(edging, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(edging, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(edging, has quality cost)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(edging, has quality cost)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(maintenance, has quality cost)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(piece, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(accessory, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(maintenance, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beat, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(touching, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(climbing, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(beat, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(climbing, is expensive)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(beat, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(maintenance, has quality cost)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(piece, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(accessory, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(maintenance, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(edging, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)