edmonton: is boring

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, city
Weight: 0.55
, london
Weight: 0.53
, canada
Weight: 0.50
Siblings montreal
Weight: 0.34
, toronto
Weight: 0.34
, quebec city
Weight: 0.34
, lexington
Weight: 0.34
, denver
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is boring 1.00
is bland 0.82
is bland hell hole 0.81
is bland hell hole compared 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(edmonton, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(montreal, is boring)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(edmonton, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(montreal, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(montreal, is boring)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(edmonton, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(edmonton, is boring)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(edmonton, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(edmonton, is bland hell hole)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(edmonton, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(edmonton, is bland hell hole)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(edmonton, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(edmonton, is bland hell hole)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(edmonton, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(edmonton, is bland hell hole)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(edmonton, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(edmonton, is bland hell hole compared)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(edmonton, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(edmonton, is bland)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(edmonton, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(edmonton, is bland hell hole compared)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(edmonton, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(edmonton, is bland)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(edmonton, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(edmonton, is bland hell hole compared)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(edmonton, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(edmonton, is bland hell hole compared)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(edmonton, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(edmonton, is bland)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(edmonton, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(edmonton, is bland)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(edmonton, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(edmonton, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(edmonton, is boring)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(edmonton, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(edmonton, is boring)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(edmonton, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(montreal, is boring)