eel: be considered toxic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fish
Weight: 0.70
, seafood
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.63
, ingredient
Weight: 0.60
, creature
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lamprey
Weight: 0.47
, electric eel
Weight: 0.38
, sturgeon
Weight: 0.38
, koi carp
Weight: 0.38
, rainbow trout
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered toxic 1.00
be dangerous 0.76
is dangerous 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(seafood, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(eel, be considered toxic)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(eel, be considered toxic)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(seafood, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(eel, be considered toxic)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(seafood, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(eel, be considered toxic)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(sturgeon, is dangerous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(eel, be considered toxic)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(electric eel, be dangerous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(eel, be considered toxic)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(electric eel, is dangerous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(seafood, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(eel, be considered toxic)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(eel, be considered toxic)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(eel, be considered toxic)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(sturgeon, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(sturgeon, is dangerous)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(eel, be considered toxic)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(electric eel, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(electric eel, is dangerous)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(eel, be considered toxic)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(electric eel, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(electric eel, be dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(eel, be considered toxic)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(eel, be considered toxic)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(eel, be considered toxic)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(eel, be dangerous)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(eel, be considered toxic)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(eel, be dangerous)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(eel, be considered toxic)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(eel, is dangerous)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(eel, be considered toxic)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(eel, is dangerous)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(eel, be considered toxic)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(eel, be dangerous)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(eel, be considered toxic)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(eel, is dangerous)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(eel, be considered toxic)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(eel, be dangerous)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(eel, be considered toxic)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(eel, is dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(eel, be considered toxic)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(eel, be considered toxic)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(eel, be considered toxic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(eel, be considered toxic)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(eel, be considered toxic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(eel, be considered toxic)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(seafood, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(eel, be considered toxic)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(sturgeon, is dangerous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(eel, be considered toxic)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(electric eel, be dangerous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(eel, be considered toxic)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(electric eel, is dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(eel, be considered toxic)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(seafood, is dangerous)