effect: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents element
Weight: 0.65
, variable
Weight: 0.64
, greenhouse effect
Weight: 0.62
, aspect
Weight: 0.61
Siblings depth
Weight: 0.62
, rise
Weight: 0.61
, viscosity
Weight: 0.61
, weight
Weight: 0.59
, phase
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is bad 0.78
enhance overall sound 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(greenhouse effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(effect, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(variable, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(effect, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(aspect, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(effect, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(greenhouse effect, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(aspect, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(variable, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aspect, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(greenhouse effect, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(variable, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(rise, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(rise, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(greenhouse effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(effect, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(variable, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(effect, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(aspect, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(effect, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(rise, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(rise, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(rise, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(rise, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(effect, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(effect, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(effect, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(effect, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(effect, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(effect, is bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(effect, enhance overall sound)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(effect, enhance overall sound)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(effect, enhance overall sound)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(effect, is bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(effect, is bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(effect, is bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(effect, enhance overall sound)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(effect, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(effect, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(aspect, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(variable, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(greenhouse effect, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rise, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(rise, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(greenhouse effect, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(aspect, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(effect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(variable, has quality bad)