elasticity: be useful for managers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, parameter
Weight: 0.60
, quality
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, property
Weight: 0.57
Siblings tensile strength
Weight: 0.35
, characteristic
Weight: 0.34
, viscosity
Weight: 0.34
, texture
Weight: 0.33
, permeability
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful for managers 1.00
be useful 0.80
is useful 0.80
is important management issue 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(parameter, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(elasticity, be useful for managers)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(factor, be useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(elasticity, be useful for managers)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(concept, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(elasticity, be useful for managers)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(quality, is important management issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(elasticity, be useful for managers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(elasticity, be useful for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(concept, is useful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(elasticity, be useful for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(factor, be useful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(elasticity, be useful for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(parameter, is useful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(elasticity, be useful for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(quality, is important management issue)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(elasticity, be useful for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(quality, is important management issue)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(elasticity, be useful for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(parameter, is useful)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(elasticity, be useful for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(factor, be useful)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(elasticity, be useful for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(concept, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(elasticity, be useful for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(viscosity, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(parameter, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(elasticity, be useful for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(elasticity, be useful for managers)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(factor, be useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(elasticity, be useful for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(elasticity, be useful for managers)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(concept, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(elasticity, be useful for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(elasticity, be useful for managers)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(quality, is important management issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(elasticity, be useful for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(elasticity, be useful for managers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(elasticity, be useful for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(viscosity, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(viscosity, is useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(elasticity, be useful for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(elasticity, be useful for managers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(elasticity, be useful for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(elasticity, be useful for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(elasticity, be useful for managers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(elasticity, be useful for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(elasticity, be useful for managers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(elasticity, be useful for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(concept, is useful)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(elasticity, be useful for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(factor, be useful)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(elasticity, be useful for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(parameter, is useful)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(elasticity, be useful for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(quality, is important management issue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(elasticity, be useful for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(viscosity, is useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(elasticity, be useful for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(concept, is useful)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(elasticity, be useful for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(factor, be useful)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(elasticity, be useful for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(parameter, is useful)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(elasticity, be useful for managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(quality, is important management issue)