elderly person: be at higher risk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.68
, resident
Weight: 0.64
, family member
Weight: 0.62
, adult
Weight: 0.62
Siblings homeless person
Weight: 0.42
, one person
Weight: 0.41
, other person
Weight: 0.41
, young person
Weight: 0.40
, dead person
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at higher risk 1.00
be at risk 0.92
be at higher risk for illnesses 0.86
be at higher risk for foodborne illnesses 0.79
be at risk for illnesses 0.78
be at more risk for tb 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(elderly person, be at higher risk)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(elderly person, be at higher risk)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(elderly person, be at higher risk)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(elderly person, be at risk)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(elderly person, be at higher risk)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(elderly person, be at more risk for tb)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(elderly person, be at higher risk)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(elderly person, be at higher risk for foodborne illnesses)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(elderly person, be at higher risk)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(elderly person, be at risk for illnesses)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(elderly person, be at higher risk)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(elderly person, be at higher risk for illnesses)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(elderly person, be at higher risk)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(elderly person, be at risk)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(elderly person, be at higher risk)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(elderly person, be at risk)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(elderly person, be at higher risk)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(elderly person, be at higher risk for illnesses)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(elderly person, be at higher risk)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(elderly person, be at higher risk for foodborne illnesses)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(elderly person, be at higher risk)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(elderly person, be at higher risk for illnesses)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(elderly person, be at higher risk)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(elderly person, be at risk for illnesses)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(elderly person, be at higher risk)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(elderly person, be at more risk for tb)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(elderly person, be at higher risk)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(elderly person, be at risk)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(elderly person, be at higher risk)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(elderly person, be at higher risk for foodborne illnesses)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(elderly person, be at higher risk)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(elderly person, be at more risk for tb)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(elderly person, be at higher risk)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(elderly person, be at higher risk for foodborne illnesses)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(elderly person, be at higher risk)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(elderly person, be at more risk for tb)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(elderly person, be at higher risk)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(elderly person, be at higher risk for illnesses)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(elderly person, be at higher risk)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(elderly person, be at risk for illnesses)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(elderly person, be at higher risk)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(elderly person, be at risk for illnesses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(elderly person, be at higher risk)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(elderly person, be at higher risk)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(elderly person, be at higher risk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(elderly person, be at higher risk)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(elderly person, be at higher risk)