electric shock: be more dangerous on skin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, punishment
Weight: 0.63
, injury
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, device
Weight: 0.62
Siblings electric motor
Weight: 0.37
, electric toothbrush
Weight: 0.36
, electric heater
Weight: 0.35
, electric fan
Weight: 0.35
, electric eel
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more dangerous on skin 1.00
be more dangerous on wet skin 0.94
is dangerous 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(electric shock, be more dangerous on skin)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is dangerous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(electric shock, be more dangerous on skin)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(electric eel, is dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(electric shock, be more dangerous on skin)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(electric eel, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(electric eel, is dangerous)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(electric shock, be more dangerous on skin)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(electric heater, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(electric heater, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(electric shock, be more dangerous on skin)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(electric shock, be more dangerous on skin)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(electric shock, be more dangerous on skin)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(electric shock, be more dangerous on wet skin)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(electric shock, be more dangerous on skin)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(electric shock, be more dangerous on wet skin)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(electric shock, be more dangerous on skin)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(electric shock, be more dangerous on wet skin)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(electric shock, be more dangerous on skin)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(electric shock, be more dangerous on wet skin)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(electric shock, be more dangerous on skin)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(electric shock, is dangerous)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(electric shock, be more dangerous on skin)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(electric shock, is dangerous)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(electric shock, be more dangerous on skin)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(electric shock, is dangerous)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(electric shock, be more dangerous on skin)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(electric shock, is dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(electric shock, be more dangerous on skin)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(electric shock, be more dangerous on skin)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(electric shock, be more dangerous on skin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(electric shock, be more dangerous on skin)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(electric shock, be more dangerous on skin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(electric shock, be more dangerous on skin)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(electric heater, is dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(electric shock, be more dangerous on skin)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(electric eel, is dangerous)