electrician: has screwdriver

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents worker
Weight: 0.66
, mechanic
Weight: 0.64
, construction worker
Weight: 0.63
, craftsman
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.58
Siblings machinist
Weight: 0.37
, carpenter
Weight: 0.37
, office worker
Weight: 0.36
, auto mechanic
Weight: 0.36
, janitor
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has screwdriver 1.00
use screwdrivers 0.82
use screwdrivers with rubber 0.80
use nails instead of screws 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(electrician, has screwdriver)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use nails instead of screws)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electrician, has screwdriver)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(carpenter, use nails instead of screws)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use nails instead of screws)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electrician, has screwdriver)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(electrician, has screwdriver)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(electrician, has screwdriver)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(electrician, use screwdrivers with rubber)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(electrician, has screwdriver)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(electrician, use screwdrivers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(electrician, has screwdriver)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(electrician, use screwdrivers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electrician, has screwdriver)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(electrician, use screwdrivers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(electrician, has screwdriver)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use screwdrivers with rubber)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electrician, has screwdriver)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(electrician, use screwdrivers with rubber)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(electrician, has screwdriver)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(electrician, use screwdrivers with rubber)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(electrician, has screwdriver)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use screwdrivers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(electrician, has screwdriver)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(electrician, has screwdriver)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(electrician, has screwdriver)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electrician, has screwdriver)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(electrician, has screwdriver)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(electrician, has screwdriver)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(carpenter, use nails instead of screws)