electrician: hate engineers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents worker
Weight: 0.66
, mechanic
Weight: 0.64
, construction worker
Weight: 0.63
, craftsman
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.58
Siblings machinist
Weight: 0.37
, carpenter
Weight: 0.37
, office worker
Weight: 0.36
, auto mechanic
Weight: 0.36
, janitor
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
hate engineers 1.00
be important in engineering 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mechanic, be important in engineering)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(electrician, hate engineers)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(mechanic, hate engineers)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(electrician, hate engineers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(electrician, hate engineers)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(mechanic, hate engineers)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(electrician, hate engineers)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(mechanic, be important in engineering)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(electrician, hate engineers)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, hate engineers)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(electrician, hate engineers)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, be important in engineering)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(mechanic, hate engineers)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(electrician, hate engineers)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(electrician, hate engineers)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(mechanic, be important in engineering)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(electrician, hate engineers)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(electrician, hate engineers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(electrician, hate engineers)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(electrician, hate engineers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(electrician, hate engineers)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(electrician, hate engineers)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(electrician, hate engineers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(electrician, hate engineers)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(electrician, hate engineers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(electrician, hate engineers)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mechanic, hate engineers)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(electrician, hate engineers)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mechanic, be important in engineering)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(electrician, hate engineers)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mechanic, hate engineers)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(electrician, hate engineers)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mechanic, be important in engineering)