electrician: use algebra

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents worker
Weight: 0.66
, mechanic
Weight: 0.64
, construction worker
Weight: 0.63
, craftsman
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.58
Siblings machinist
Weight: 0.37
, carpenter
Weight: 0.37
, office worker
Weight: 0.36
, auto mechanic
Weight: 0.36
, janitor
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
use algebra 1.00
need algebra 0.98
use math 0.89
use trigonometry 0.87
require school diploma 0.75
require high school diploma 0.75
use geometry 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(electrician, use algebra)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(mechanic, use math)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(electrician, use algebra)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(electrician, use algebra)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(construction worker, use geometry)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(electrician, use algebra)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use math)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(construction worker, use geometry)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(mechanic, use math)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use algebra)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(mechanic, use math)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use math)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use geometry)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use algebra)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(construction worker, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(electrician, use algebra)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(mechanic, use math)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(electrician, use algebra)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(construction worker, use math)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(electrician, use algebra)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(construction worker, use geometry)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(electrician, use algebra)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(carpenter, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use algebra)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(carpenter, use trigonometry)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use trigonometry)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(carpenter, use math)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(carpenter, use math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(electrician, use algebra)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(electrician, use math)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(electrician, use math)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(electrician, use trigonometry)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use math)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(electrician, need algebra)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(electrician, need algebra)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(electrician, use math)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(electrician, need algebra)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(electrician, need algebra)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(electrician, use trigonometry)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(electrician, use trigonometry)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use trigonometry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(electrician, use algebra)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(construction worker, use algebra)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(mechanic, use math)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(construction worker, use geometry)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(carpenter, use algebra)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(carpenter, use math)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(carpenter, use trigonometry)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(construction worker, use geometry)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(construction worker, use algebra)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, use math)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(electrician, use algebra)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(mechanic, use math)