electricity: be dangerous

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.65
, necessity
Weight: 0.61
, service
Weight: 0.61
, force
Weight: 0.60
, property
Weight: 0.60
Siblings energy
Weight: 0.36
, power
Weight: 0.35
, fuel oil
Weight: 0.35
, water
Weight: 0.35
, fuel
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dangerous 1.00
be dangerous to person 0.95
be dangerous despite it utility 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(electricity, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(water, be dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(electricity, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(water, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(water, be dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(electricity, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(electricity, be dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(electricity, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(electricity, be dangerous to person)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(electricity, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(electricity, be dangerous to person)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(electricity, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(electricity, be dangerous to person)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(electricity, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(electricity, be dangerous despite it utility)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(electricity, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(electricity, be dangerous despite it utility)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(electricity, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(electricity, be dangerous to person)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(electricity, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(electricity, be dangerous despite it utility)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(electricity, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(electricity, be dangerous despite it utility)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(electricity, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(electricity, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(electricity, be dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(electricity, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(electricity, be dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(electricity, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(water, be dangerous)