electricity: is dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents utility
Weight: 0.70
, commodity
Weight: 0.65
, sector
Weight: 0.64
, service
Weight: 0.61
Siblings energy
Weight: 0.36
, power plant
Weight: 0.36
, power line
Weight: 0.36
, gas
Weight: 0.35
, fuel oil
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dangerous 1.00
be dangerous in water 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(electricity, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(power line, is dangerous)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(electricity, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(gas, is dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(electricity, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(gas, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(gas, is dangerous)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(electricity, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(power line, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(power line, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(electricity, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(electricity, is dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(electricity, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(electricity, be dangerous in water)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(electricity, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(electricity, be dangerous in water)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(electricity, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(electricity, be dangerous in water)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(electricity, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(electricity, be dangerous in water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(electricity, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(electricity, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(electricity, is dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(electricity, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(electricity, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(electricity, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(power line, is dangerous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(electricity, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(gas, is dangerous)