electrolysis: be cheaper than laser

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents treatment
Weight: 0.59
, method
Weight: 0.57
, chemical reaction
Weight: 0.55
, process
Weight: 0.54
Siblings hydrolysis
Weight: 0.33
, fermentation
Weight: 0.33
, extraction
Weight: 0.32
, hydrogen
Weight: 0.32
, distillation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than laser 1.00
is expensive 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(treatment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(electrolysis, be cheaper than laser)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(electrolysis, be cheaper than laser)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(treatment, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(electrolysis, be cheaper than laser)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(treatment, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(electrolysis, be cheaper than laser)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(extraction, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(electrolysis, be cheaper than laser)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(distillation, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(electrolysis, be cheaper than laser)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hydrogen, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(treatment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(electrolysis, be cheaper than laser)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(electrolysis, be cheaper than laser)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(electrolysis, be cheaper than laser)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(hydrogen, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(hydrogen, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(electrolysis, be cheaper than laser)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(distillation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(distillation, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(electrolysis, be cheaper than laser)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(extraction, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(extraction, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(electrolysis, be cheaper than laser)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(electrolysis, be cheaper than laser)

Similarity expansion

0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(electrolysis, be cheaper than laser)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(electrolysis, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(electrolysis, be cheaper than laser)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(electrolysis, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(electrolysis, be cheaper than laser)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(electrolysis, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(electrolysis, be cheaper than laser)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(electrolysis, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(electrolysis, be cheaper than laser)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(electrolysis, be cheaper than laser)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(electrolysis, be cheaper than laser)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(electrolysis, be cheaper than laser)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(electrolysis, be cheaper than laser)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(electrolysis, be cheaper than laser)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(treatment, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(electrolysis, be cheaper than laser)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(hydrogen, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(electrolysis, be cheaper than laser)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(extraction, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(electrolysis, be cheaper than laser)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(distillation, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(electrolysis, be cheaper than laser)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(treatment, is expensive)