electrolysis: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents treatment
Weight: 0.59
, method
Weight: 0.57
, chemical reaction
Weight: 0.55
, process
Weight: 0.54
Siblings hydrolysis
Weight: 0.33
, fermentation
Weight: 0.33
, extraction
Weight: 0.32
, hydrogen
Weight: 0.32
, distillation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality change 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(electrolysis, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(distillation, has quality better)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(electrolysis, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(extraction, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(electrolysis, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(extraction, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(extraction, has quality better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(electrolysis, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(distillation, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(distillation, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(electrolysis, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(electrolysis, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(electrolysis, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(electrolysis, has quality change)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(electrolysis, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(electrolysis, has quality change)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(electrolysis, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(electrolysis, has quality change)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(electrolysis, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(electrolysis, has quality change)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(electrolysis, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(electrolysis, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(electrolysis, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(electrolysis, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(electrolysis, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(electrolysis, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(extraction, has quality better)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(electrolysis, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(distillation, has quality better)