electronic device: improve audio

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.74
, instrument
Weight: 0.70
, material
Weight: 0.69
, accessory
Weight: 0.66
Siblings network device
Weight: 0.83
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.80
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.79
, digital camera
Weight: 0.76
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.76

Related properties

Property Similarity
improve audio 1.00
improved by technology 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(electronic device, improve audio)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(material, improved by technology)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(electronic device, improve audio)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(electronic device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(device, improve audio)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(electronic device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(material, improved by technology)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(device, improve audio)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(material, improved by technology)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(electronic device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(electronic device, improve audio)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(material, improved by technology)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(electronic device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(electronic device, improve audio)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(electronic device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(electronic device, improve audio)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(electronic device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(electronic device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, improve audio)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(electronic device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(electronic device, improve audio)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(material, improved by technology)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(device, improve audio)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(electronic device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(device, improve audio)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(electronic device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(material, improved by technology)