electronic: is records important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.59
, format
Weight: 0.53
, method
Weight: 0.49
, form
Weight: 0.49
, medium
Weight: 0.48
Siblings electronic device
Weight: 0.39
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.34
, network device
Weight: 0.34
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.34
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is records important 1.00
is records 0.97
is medical records important 0.92
is medical records 0.90
be important in databases 0.76
be important part of database 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(form, be important part of database)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(electronic, is records important)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(form, be important in databases)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(electronic, is records important)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(electronic, is records important)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(form, be important in databases)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(electronic, is records important)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(form, be important part of database)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(electronic, is records important)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(form, be important part of database)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(electronic, is records important)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(form, be important in databases)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(form, be important part of database)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(electronic, is records important)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(electronic, is records important)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(form, be important in databases)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(electronic, is records important)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(electronic, is records important)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(electronic, is records important)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(electronic, is records important)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(electronic, is records important)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(electronic, is records)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(electronic, is records important)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(electronic, is records)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(electronic, is records important)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(electronic, is records)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(electronic, is records important)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(electronic, is medical records important)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(electronic, is records important)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(electronic, is medical records important)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(electronic, is records important)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(electronic, is medical records)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(electronic, is records important)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(electronic, is medical records)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(electronic, is records important)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(electronic, is medical records important)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(electronic, is records important)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(electronic, is medical records)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(electronic, is records important)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(electronic, is medical records)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(electronic, is records important)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(electronic, is medical records important)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(electronic, is records important)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(electronic, is records)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(electronic, is records important)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(electronic, is records important)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(electronic, is records important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(electronic, is records important)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(electronic, is records important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(electronic, is records important)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(form, be important in databases)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(electronic, is records important)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(form, be important part of database)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(electronic, is records important)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(form, be important in databases)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(electronic, is records important)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(form, be important part of database)