electronics: be expensive in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.69
, merchandise
Weight: 0.66
, gift
Weight: 0.63
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, sector
Weight: 0.61
Siblings solar cell
Weight: 0.65
, resistor
Weight: 0.55
, ballast
Weight: 0.52
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.36
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in canada 1.00
be expensive in australia 0.90
be more expensive in australia 0.89
be expensive in india 0.88
be more expensive in uk 0.87
be cheaper in usa 0.87
be cheaper in in uk 0.86
be cheap in usa 0.86
cost in australia 0.85
be expensive in mexico 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(electronics, be expensive in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(electronics, be more expensive in australia)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(electronics, be more expensive in australia)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be more expensive in australia)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(electronics, be cheaper in usa)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(electronics, be cheaper in usa)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be cheaper in usa)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be expensive in australia)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(electronics, be expensive in australia)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(electronics, be expensive in australia)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(electronics, be cheap in usa)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be expensive in mexico)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(electronics, be cheap in usa)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be cheap in usa)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(electronics, be expensive in mexico)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be expensive in india)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(electronics, be expensive in mexico)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(electronics, be expensive in india)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(electronics, be more expensive in australia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(electronics, be expensive in india)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(electronics, be cheaper in usa)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(electronics, be cheap in usa)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(electronics, be expensive in australia)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(electronics, be expensive in mexico)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(electronics, be expensive in india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be expensive in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(electronics, be expensive in canada)