electronics: be more expensive in uk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.69
, merchandise
Weight: 0.66
, gift
Weight: 0.63
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, sector
Weight: 0.61
Siblings solar cell
Weight: 0.65
, resistor
Weight: 0.55
, ballast
Weight: 0.52
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.36
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive in uk 1.00
be cheaper in in uk 0.95
cost much more in uk 0.94
uk 0.90
be more expensive in australia 0.89
be expensive in canada 0.87
be more expensive in europe 0.87
be cheaper in usa 0.86
be expensive in india 0.86
be expensive in australia 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(gift, uk)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(electronics, be more expensive in uk)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(gift, uk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(gift, uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(gift, uk)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(electronics, be more expensive in uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(electronics, be more expensive in uk)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(electronics, be more expensive in australia)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(electronics, be more expensive in australia)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be more expensive in australia)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(electronics, be expensive in canada)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(electronics, be expensive in canada)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be expensive in canada)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(electronics, be cheaper in usa)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(electronics, be cheaper in usa)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be cheaper in usa)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(electronics, be more expensive in europe)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(electronics, be more expensive in europe)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be more expensive in europe)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be expensive in australia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(electronics, be expensive in australia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(electronics, be expensive in australia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be expensive in india)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(electronics, be expensive in india)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(electronics, be more expensive in australia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(electronics, be expensive in canada)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(electronics, be expensive in india)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(electronics, be cheaper in usa)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(electronics, be more expensive in europe)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(electronics, be expensive in australia)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(electronics, be expensive in india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be more expensive in uk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(electronics, be more expensive in uk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(gift, uk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(electronics, be more expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(gift, uk)