elephant: roll in mud

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.74
, wild animal
Weight: 0.72
, mammal
Weight: 0.72
, species
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.64
Siblings african elephant
Weight: 0.77
, rhino
Weight: 0.39
, tiger
Weight: 0.38
, elephant seal
Weight: 0.38
, komodo dragon
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
roll in mud 1.00
roll around in mud 0.98
use mud 0.92
play with mud 0.92
eat mud 0.91
throw mud 0.90
put mud on themselves 0.90
cover in mud 0.89
throw mud on themselves 0.88
bathe in mud 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(elephant, roll in mud)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(rhino, roll in mud)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(elephant, roll in mud)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(rhino, roll in mud)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(rhino, roll in mud)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(elephant, roll in mud)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(elephant, roll in mud)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(elephant, roll in mud)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(elephant, eat mud)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(elephant, roll in mud)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(elephant, eat mud)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(elephant, roll in mud)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(elephant, eat mud)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(elephant, roll in mud)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(elephant, eat mud)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(elephant, roll in mud)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(elephant, roll in mud)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(elephant, roll in mud)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(elephant, roll in mud)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(elephant, roll in mud)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(elephant, roll in mud)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(rhino, roll in mud)