elevation: be determined on contour map

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, attribute
Weight: 0.58
, parameter
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.58
Siblings altitude
Weight: 0.34
, slope
Weight: 0.33
, gradient
Weight: 0.33
, height
Weight: 0.32
, density
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be determined on contour map 1.00
be represented on topographic map 0.83
be vertically exaggerated on cross map 0.78
be represented on map 0.78
be vertically exaggerated on cross sectional map 0.77
be used in geometry 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(elevation, be determined on contour map)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(altitude, be used in geometry)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(elevation, be determined on contour map)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(altitude, be used in geometry)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(altitude, be used in geometry)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(elevation, be determined on contour map)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(elevation, be determined on contour map)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(elevation, be determined on contour map)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(elevation, be represented on topographic map)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(elevation, be determined on contour map)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(elevation, be represented on topographic map)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(elevation, be determined on contour map)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(elevation, be represented on topographic map)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(elevation, be determined on contour map)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross map)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(elevation, be determined on contour map)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(elevation, be represented on map)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(elevation, be determined on contour map)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross map)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(elevation, be determined on contour map)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross sectional map)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(elevation, be determined on contour map)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross sectional map)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(elevation, be determined on contour map)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(elevation, be represented on map)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(elevation, be determined on contour map)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross map)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(elevation, be determined on contour map)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross sectional map)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(elevation, be determined on contour map)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(elevation, be represented on map)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(elevation, be determined on contour map)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross sectional map)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(elevation, be determined on contour map)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(elevation, be vertically exaggerated on cross map)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(elevation, be determined on contour map)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(elevation, be represented on topographic map)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(elevation, be determined on contour map)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(elevation, be represented on map)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(elevation, be determined on contour map)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(elevation, be determined on contour map)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(elevation, be determined on contour map)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(elevation, be determined on contour map)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(elevation, be determined on contour map)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(elevation, be determined on contour map)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(altitude, be used in geometry)