elizabeth: was simcoe important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents queen
Weight: 0.68
, girl
Weight: 0.67
, woman
Weight: 0.66
, queen elizabeth
Weight: 0.62
Siblings lydia
Weight: 0.36
, mary
Weight: 0.36
, nancy
Weight: 0.35
, emma
Weight: 0.35
, alice
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was simcoe important 1.00
was cady stanton important 1.00
is blackwell important 0.93
is cady stanton important 0.93
is stanton important 0.93
was inprisoned 0.84
is cady stanton 0.79
is stanton 0.79
was famous 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(queen elizabeth, was famous)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(elizabeth, was simcoe important)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(queen elizabeth, was famous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(queen elizabeth, was famous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(queen elizabeth, was famous)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(elizabeth, was simcoe important)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(elizabeth, was simcoe important)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(elizabeth, was cady stanton important)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(elizabeth, was cady stanton important)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(elizabeth, is cady stanton important)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(elizabeth, was cady stanton important)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(elizabeth, is stanton important)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(elizabeth, was cady stanton important)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(elizabeth, is cady stanton important)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(elizabeth, is stanton important)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(elizabeth, is cady stanton important)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(elizabeth, is cady stanton important)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(elizabeth, is stanton important)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(elizabeth, is stanton important)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(elizabeth, was inprisoned)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(elizabeth, is cady stanton)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(elizabeth, is stanton)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(elizabeth, is cady stanton)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(elizabeth, is stanton)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(elizabeth, is cady stanton)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(elizabeth, is cady stanton)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(elizabeth, is stanton)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(elizabeth, was inprisoned)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(elizabeth, is stanton)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(elizabeth, was inprisoned)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(elizabeth, was inprisoned)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(elizabeth, was famous)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(elizabeth, was famous)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(elizabeth, was famous)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(elizabeth, was famous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(elizabeth, was simcoe important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(elizabeth, was simcoe important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(queen elizabeth, was famous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(elizabeth, was simcoe important)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(queen elizabeth, was famous)