elk: have white butts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.76
, animal
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.68
, deer
Weight: 0.67
, meat
Weight: 0.64
Siblings moose
Weight: 0.64
, bison
Weight: 0.40
, wolf
Weight: 0.39
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
have white butts 1.00
has physical part butts 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(elk, have white butts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(elk, have white butts)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(elk, have white butts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(elk, has physical part butts)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(elk, have white butts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(elk, has physical part butts)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(elk, have white butts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(elk, has physical part butts)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(elk, have white butts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(elk, has physical part butts)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(elk, have white butts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(elk, have white butts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(elk, have white butts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(elk, have white butts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(elk, have white butts)