elk: rub on trees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.76
, animal
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.68
, deer
Weight: 0.67
, meat
Weight: 0.64
Siblings moose
Weight: 0.64
, bison
Weight: 0.40
, wolf
Weight: 0.39
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
rub on trees 1.00
eat aspen bark 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(deer, rub on trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(elk, rub on trees)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(elk, rub on trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(deer, rub on trees)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(elk, rub on trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(deer, rub on trees)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(deer, rub on trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(elk, rub on trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(elk, rub on trees)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(elk, rub on trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(elk, rub on trees)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(elk, rub on trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(elk, eat aspen bark)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(elk, rub on trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(elk, eat aspen bark)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(elk, rub on trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(elk, eat aspen bark)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(elk, rub on trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(elk, eat aspen bark)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(elk, rub on trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(elk, rub on trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(elk, rub on trees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(elk, rub on trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(elk, rub on trees)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(elk, rub on trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(deer, rub on trees)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(elk, rub on trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(deer, rub on trees)