elk: survive in coniferous forest

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.76
, animal
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.68
, deer
Weight: 0.67
, meat
Weight: 0.64
Siblings moose
Weight: 0.64
, bison
Weight: 0.40
, wolf
Weight: 0.39
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
survive in coniferous forest 1.00
survive in forest 0.92
eat aspen bark 0.82
survive in wild 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(elk, survive in coniferous forest)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(elk, survive in coniferous forest)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(elk, survive in coniferous forest)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(elk, survive in forest)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(elk, survive in coniferous forest)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(elk, survive in forest)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(elk, survive in coniferous forest)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(elk, survive in forest)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(elk, survive in coniferous forest)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(elk, survive in forest)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(elk, survive in coniferous forest)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(elk, eat aspen bark)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(elk, survive in coniferous forest)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(elk, eat aspen bark)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(elk, survive in coniferous forest)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(elk, eat aspen bark)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(elk, survive in coniferous forest)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(elk, eat aspen bark)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(elk, survive in coniferous forest)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(elk, survive in wild)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(elk, survive in coniferous forest)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(elk, survive in wild)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(elk, survive in coniferous forest)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(elk, survive in wild)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(elk, survive in coniferous forest)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(elk, survive in wild)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(elk, survive in coniferous forest)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(elk, survive in coniferous forest)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(elk, survive in coniferous forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(elk, survive in coniferous forest)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(elk, survive in coniferous forest)