email: be popular over mail

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents page
Weight: 0.63
, letter
Weight: 0.62
, web site
Weight: 0.61
, gift
Weight: 0.61
Siblings junk mail
Weight: 0.65
, complaint
Weight: 0.60
, reminder
Weight: 0.57
, id
Weight: 0.56
, thunderbird
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular over mail 1.00
be in mail 0.94
be different from mail 0.93
go to mail 0.92
be popular over conventional mail 0.90
be in mail sent 0.88
lost in mail 0.88
go to bulk mail 0.87
get lost in mail 0.87
be different from ordinary mail 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(letter, get lost in mail)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(email, be popular over mail)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(letter, lost in mail)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(email, be popular over mail)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(letter, be in mail)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(email, be popular over mail)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(letter, be in mail)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(letter, lost in mail)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(letter, get lost in mail)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(letter, get lost in mail)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(letter, lost in mail)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(letter, be in mail)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(letter, get lost in mail)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(email, be popular over mail)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(letter, lost in mail)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(email, be popular over mail)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(letter, be in mail)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(email, be popular over mail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(email, be popular over mail)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(email, go to mail)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(email, go to mail)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(email, go to mail)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(email, be different from mail)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(email, be different from mail)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(email, be different from mail)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(email, be popular over conventional mail)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(email, be different from ordinary mail)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(email, be different from ordinary mail)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(email, be different from ordinary mail)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(email, be popular over conventional mail)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(email, be popular over conventional mail)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(email, be popular over conventional mail)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(email, be different from mail)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(email, go to mail)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(email, be different from ordinary mail)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(email, be popular over mail)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(email, be popular over mail)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(letter, be in mail)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(letter, lost in mail)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(letter, get lost in mail)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(letter, be in mail)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(letter, lost in mail)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(email, be popular over mail)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(letter, get lost in mail)