emergency: has quality services

Related concepts

Parents	vehicle Weight: 0.57 , instance Weight: 0.57 , condition Weight: 0.56 , issue Weight: 0.55 , concern Weight: 0.55
Siblings	cardiac arrest Weight: 0.68 , accident Weight: 0.64 , panic Weight: 0.59 , crisis Weight: 0.58 , bomb Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality services	1.00
was services	0.93
was services developed	0.87
was medical services	0.86
was medical services developed	0.84
has quality cost	0.80
has quality good	0.80
has quality function	0.78
has quality bad	0.77
has quality class	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(instance, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(emergency, has quality services)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(instance, has quality class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(emergency, has quality services)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(instance, has quality function)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(instance, has quality class)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(instance, has quality function)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(instance, has quality class)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(cardiac arrest, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(instance, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(emergency, has quality services)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(instance, has quality class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(emergency, has quality services)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(cardiac arrest, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(cardiac arrest, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Salient(emergency, has quality services)

Similarity expansion

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.28

Typical(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(emergency, was services)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(emergency, was services)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(emergency, was medical services developed)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.28

Typical(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(emergency, was services developed)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(emergency, was medical services)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.16

Salient(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(emergency, was services)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(emergency, was services developed)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.28

Typical(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(emergency, was medical services)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.28

Typical(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(emergency, was medical services developed)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(emergency, was services developed)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(emergency, was medical services)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.16

Salient(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(emergency, was medical services developed)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(emergency, was medical services developed)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.16

Salient(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(emergency, was services developed)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.16

Salient(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(emergency, was medical services)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(emergency, was services)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Salient(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(emergency, has quality services)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(emergency, has quality services)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(instance, has quality function)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(instance, has quality class)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(cardiac arrest, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.28

Typical(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(instance, has quality function)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.28

Typical(emergency, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(instance, has quality class)