:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(emma, is awesome)
⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(betty, is amazing)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(emma, is awesome)
⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(emma, is awesome)
Similarity expansion
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(emma, is awesome)
⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(emma, is amazing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(emma, is awesome)
⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(emma, is weird)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(emma, is awesome)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(emma, is weird)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(emma, is awesome)
⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(emma, is amazing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(emma, is awesome)
⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(emma, is weird)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(emma, is awesome)
⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(emma, is weird)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(emma, is awesome)
⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(emma, is awesome)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(emma, is awesome)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(betty, is amazing)