employee: acounting information

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents other person
Weight: 0.69
, partner
Weight: 0.65
, creditor
Weight: 0.64
, officer
Weight: 0.63
Siblings office worker
Weight: 0.74
, construction worker
Weight: 0.74
, salesperson
Weight: 0.70
, receptionist
Weight: 0.69
, waiter
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
acounting information 1.00
use information 0.90
need information 0.89
use accounting information 0.86
need accounting information 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(creditor, use information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(employee, acounting information)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creditor, need information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(employee, acounting information)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(creditor, use accounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(employee, acounting information)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(creditor, need accounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(employee, acounting information)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(creditor, use information)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(creditor, need information)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(creditor, use accounting information)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(creditor, need accounting information)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use accounting information)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(creditor, need accounting information)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(creditor, need information)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use information)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(creditor, use information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(employee, acounting information)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creditor, need information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(employee, acounting information)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(creditor, use accounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(employee, acounting information)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(creditor, need accounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(employee, acounting information)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(employee, acounting information)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(employee, need information)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(employee, need accounting information)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(employee, need information)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(employee, need information)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(employee, need accounting information)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(employee, need information)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(employee, need accounting information)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(employee, need accounting information)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(employee, acounting information)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(employee, acounting information)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(creditor, use information)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(creditor, need information)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(creditor, use accounting information)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(creditor, need accounting information)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(creditor, use information)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(creditor, need information)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(creditor, use accounting information)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(employee, acounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(creditor, need accounting information)