employee: be a part of company

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents other person
Weight: 0.69
, creditor
Weight: 0.64
, driver
Weight: 0.64
, officer
Weight: 0.63
Siblings office worker
Weight: 0.74
, construction worker
Weight: 0.74
, salesperson
Weight: 0.70
, receptionist
Weight: 0.69
, waiter
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be a part of company 1.00
be at company 0.95
be at corporation 0.77
strike company 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(employee, be a part of company)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(employee, be a part of company)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(employee, be a part of company)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(employee, be at company)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(employee, be a part of company)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(employee, be at company)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(employee, be a part of company)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(employee, be at company)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(employee, be a part of company)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(employee, be at corporation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(employee, be a part of company)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(employee, be at corporation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(employee, be a part of company)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(employee, be at company)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(employee, be a part of company)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(employee, strike company)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(employee, be a part of company)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(employee, be at corporation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(employee, be a part of company)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(employee, strike company)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(employee, be a part of company)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(employee, strike company)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(employee, be a part of company)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(employee, strike company)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(employee, be a part of company)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(employee, be at corporation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(employee, be a part of company)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(employee, be a part of company)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(employee, be a part of company)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(employee, be a part of company)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(employee, be a part of company)