employee: be at meet

Related concepts

Parents	other person Weight: 0.69 , creditor Weight: 0.64 , driver Weight: 0.64 , officer Weight: 0.63
Siblings	office worker Weight: 0.74 , construction worker Weight: 0.74 , salesperson Weight: 0.70 , receptionist Weight: 0.69 , waiter Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be at meet	1.00
attend meet	0.89
be meet and greet	0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(other person, be at meet) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(employee, be at meet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(employee, be at meet) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(other person, be at meet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(employee, be at meet) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(other person, be at meet)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(employee, be at meet) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(receptionist, be meet and greet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(other person, be at meet) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(employee, be at meet) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(employee, be at meet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(employee, be at meet) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(receptionist, be meet and greet) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(receptionist, be meet and greet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(employee, be at meet) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(employee, be at meet)

Similarity expansion

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(employee, be at meet) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(employee, attend meet)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(employee, be at meet) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(employee, attend meet)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(employee, be at meet) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(employee, attend meet)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.25

Typical(employee, be at meet) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(employee, attend meet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Salient(employee, be at meet) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(employee, be at meet) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(employee, be at meet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(employee, be at meet) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(employee, be at meet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(employee, be at meet) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(other person, be at meet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(employee, be at meet) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(receptionist, be meet and greet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Typical(employee, be at meet) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(other person, be at meet)