employee: be go on vacation

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents other person
Weight: 0.69
, creditor
Weight: 0.64
, driver
Weight: 0.64
, officer
Weight: 0.63
Siblings office worker
Weight: 0.74
, construction worker
Weight: 0.74
, salesperson
Weight: 0.70
, receptionist
Weight: 0.69
, waiter
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be go on vacation 1.00
be at vacation 0.96
be go to work 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(employee, be go on vacation)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(employee, be go on vacation)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(employee, be go on vacation)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(employee, be at vacation)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(employee, be go on vacation)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(employee, be at vacation)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(employee, be go on vacation)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(employee, be at vacation)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(employee, be go on vacation)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(employee, be at vacation)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(employee, be go on vacation)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(employee, be go to work)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(employee, be go on vacation)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(employee, be go to work)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(employee, be go on vacation)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(employee, be go to work)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(employee, be go on vacation)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(employee, be go to work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(employee, be go on vacation)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(employee, be go on vacation)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(employee, be go on vacation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(employee, be go on vacation)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(employee, be go on vacation)