employee: be go to work

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents other person
Weight: 0.69
, creditor
Weight: 0.64
, driver
Weight: 0.64
, officer
Weight: 0.63
Siblings office worker
Weight: 0.74
, construction worker
Weight: 0.74
, salesperson
Weight: 0.70
, receptionist
Weight: 0.69
, waiter
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be go to work 1.00
be at work 0.92
work 0.92
wash hand before return to work 0.79
rush to work 0.78
enjoy work benefit 0.77
wants to have fun on job 0.77
be go on vacation 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(driver, work)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(employee, be go to work)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(creditor, work)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(employee, be go to work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(driver, rush to work)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(employee, be go to work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(creditor, work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(driver, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(driver, rush to work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(driver, rush to work)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(creditor, work)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(driver, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(driver, work)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(employee, be go to work)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(creditor, work)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(employee, be go to work)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(driver, rush to work)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(employee, be go to work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(employee, be go to work)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(employee, work)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(employee, be at work)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(employee, be at work)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(employee, wash hand before return to work)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(employee, wash hand before return to work)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(employee, work)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(employee, be at work)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(employee, wash hand before return to work)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(employee, work)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(employee, be go on vacation)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(employee, wants to have fun on job)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(employee, be go on vacation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(employee, enjoy work benefit)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(employee, be go on vacation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(employee, enjoy work benefit)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(employee, wants to have fun on job)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(employee, enjoy work benefit)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(employee, wants to have fun on job)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(employee, be at work)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(employee, work)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(employee, wants to have fun on job)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(employee, enjoy work benefit)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(employee, be go on vacation)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(employee, wash hand before return to work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(employee, be go to work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(employee, be go to work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(creditor, work)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(driver, work)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(driver, rush to work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(creditor, work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(driver, work)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(employee, be go to work)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(driver, rush to work)