employee: be important in organization

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents other person
Weight: 0.69
, partner
Weight: 0.65
, creditor
Weight: 0.64
, officer
Weight: 0.63
Siblings office worker
Weight: 0.74
, construction worker
Weight: 0.74
, salesperson
Weight: 0.70
, receptionist
Weight: 0.69
, waiter
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in organization 1.00
be important to organization 1.00
have important to organization behavior 0.88
resist change in organization 0.80
be important in organisation 0.79
leave organizations 0.78
be important in business 0.77
contributes to wellness of organization 0.76
be important to business 0.76
be important to company 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(partner, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(employee, be important in organization)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(creditor, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(employee, be important in organization)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(creditor, be important to business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(partner, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(partner, be important in business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creditor, be important to business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(partner, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(employee, be important in organization)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(creditor, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(employee, be important in organization)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(employee, be important in organization)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(employee, be important to organization)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to organization)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(employee, have important to organization behavior)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(employee, be important to organization)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(employee, be important to organization)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(employee, have important to organization behavior)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(employee, resist change in organization)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(employee, resist change in organization)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(employee, resist change in organization)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(employee, have important to organization behavior)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(employee, have important to organization behavior)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(employee, be important in organisation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important in organisation)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(employee, resist change in organization)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(employee, contributes to wellness of organization)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(employee, be important to business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(employee, contributes to wellness of organization)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(employee, be important to company)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to company)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(employee, be important to business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(employee, be important in organisation)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(employee, be important in organisation)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(employee, be important to business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(employee, be important to company)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(employee, be important to company)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(employee, contributes to wellness of organization)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(employee, contributes to wellness of organization)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important in organization)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(employee, be important in organization)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(creditor, be important to business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(partner, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(creditor, be important to business)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(employee, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(partner, be important in business)