employee: be important to business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents other person
Weight: 0.69
, partner
Weight: 0.65
, creditor
Weight: 0.64
, officer
Weight: 0.63
Siblings office worker
Weight: 0.74
, construction worker
Weight: 0.74
, salesperson
Weight: 0.70
, receptionist
Weight: 0.69
, waiter
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to business 1.00
be important in business 0.99
be to business 0.93
be important to businesses 0.88
affect business environment 0.86
be interested in business 0.85
be important to company 0.84
be important in organisation 0.82
influence business 0.80
beginning small businesses 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(partner, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(employee, be important to business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(partner, be to business)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(employee, be important to business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(creditor, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(employee, be important to business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(creditor, be important to business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(partner, be to business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(partner, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(partner, be important in business)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(partner, be to business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creditor, be important to business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(partner, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(employee, be important to business)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(creditor, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(employee, be important to business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(partner, be to business)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(employee, be important to business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(employee, be important to business)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(employee, affect business environment)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to businesses)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(employee, be interested in business)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(employee, affect business environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to company)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important in organisation)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(employee, influence business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(employee, be interested in business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(employee, influence business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(employee, influence business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(employee, affect business environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(employee, be important to businesses)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(employee, influence business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(employee, be important to company)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(employee, be important in organisation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(employee, be interested in business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(employee, affect business environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(employee, be important to company)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(employee, be important to businesses)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(employee, be important to company)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(employee, be important to businesses)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(employee, be interested in business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(employee, be important in organisation)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(employee, be important in organisation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(employee, be important to business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(creditor, be important to business)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(partner, be to business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(partner, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(creditor, be important to business)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(partner, be to business)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(employee, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(partner, be important in business)