employee: be part of company

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents other person
Weight: 0.69
, partner
Weight: 0.65
, creditor
Weight: 0.64
, officer
Weight: 0.63
Siblings office worker
Weight: 0.74
, construction worker
Weight: 0.74
, salesperson
Weight: 0.70
, receptionist
Weight: 0.69
, waiter
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be part of company 1.00
be important to company 0.93
help company 0.90
leave company 0.85
stay in company 0.85
be to business 0.77
be important in business 0.77
be important to business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(partner, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(employee, be part of company)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(partner, be to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(employee, be part of company)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(creditor, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(employee, be part of company)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(creditor, be important to business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(partner, be to business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(partner, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(partner, be important in business)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(partner, be to business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creditor, be important to business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(partner, be to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(employee, be part of company)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(partner, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(employee, be part of company)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(creditor, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(employee, be part of company)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(employee, be part of company)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to company)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(employee, stay in company)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(employee, stay in company)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(employee, be important to company)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(employee, stay in company)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(employee, stay in company)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(employee, be important to company)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(employee, be important to company)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(employee, be important to business)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(employee, be important to business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(employee, be important to business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(employee, be part of company)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(employee, be part of company)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(creditor, be important to business)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(partner, be to business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(partner, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(creditor, be important to business)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(partner, be to business)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(employee, be part of company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(partner, be important in business)