employee: influence business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents other person
Weight: 0.69
, partner
Weight: 0.65
, creditor
Weight: 0.64
, officer
Weight: 0.63
Siblings office worker
Weight: 0.74
, construction worker
Weight: 0.74
, salesperson
Weight: 0.70
, receptionist
Weight: 0.69
, waiter
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
influence business 1.00
be to business 0.81
be important in business 0.80
be important to business 0.80
affect business environment 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(partner, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(employee, influence business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(partner, be to business)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(employee, influence business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(creditor, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(employee, influence business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(employee, influence business)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(creditor, be important to business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(employee, influence business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(partner, be to business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(employee, influence business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(partner, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(employee, influence business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(partner, be important in business)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(employee, influence business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(partner, be to business)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(employee, influence business)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creditor, be important to business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(partner, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(employee, influence business)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(employee, influence business)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(partner, be to business)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(employee, influence business)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(employee, influence business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(creditor, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(employee, influence business)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(employee, influence business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(employee, influence business)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(employee, influence business)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(employee, influence business)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(employee, affect business environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(employee, influence business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(employee, influence business)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(employee, affect business environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(employee, influence business)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(employee, affect business environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(employee, influence business)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(employee, be important to business)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(employee, influence business)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(employee, affect business environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(employee, influence business)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(employee, be important to business)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(employee, influence business)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(employee, be important to business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(employee, influence business)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(employee, influence business)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(employee, influence business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(employee, influence business)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(employee, influence business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(employee, influence business)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(creditor, be important to business)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(employee, influence business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(partner, be to business)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(employee, influence business)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(partner, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(employee, influence business)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(creditor, be important to business)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(employee, influence business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(partner, be to business)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(employee, influence business)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(partner, be important in business)