employee: need information

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents other person
Weight: 0.69
, partner
Weight: 0.65
, creditor
Weight: 0.64
, officer
Weight: 0.63
Siblings office worker
Weight: 0.74
, construction worker
Weight: 0.74
, salesperson
Weight: 0.70
, receptionist
Weight: 0.69
, waiter
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
need information 1.00
use information 0.95
acounting information 0.89
need accounting information 0.87
use accounting information 0.83
need tips 0.76
need know 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creditor, need information)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(employee, need information)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(creditor, use information)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(employee, need information)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(creditor, need accounting information)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(employee, need information)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(employee, need information)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(creditor, need information)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(creditor, use information)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(creditor, use accounting information)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(creditor, need accounting information)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use accounting information)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(creditor, need accounting information)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(creditor, need information)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use information)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(waiter, need tips)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creditor, need information)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(employee, need information)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(creditor, use information)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(employee, need information)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(creditor, need accounting information)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(employee, need information)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(employee, need information)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(waiter, need tips)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(waiter, need tips)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(employee, need information)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(employee, acounting information)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(employee, need accounting information)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(employee, acounting information)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(employee, need accounting information)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(employee, acounting information)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(employee, acounting information)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(employee, need accounting information)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(employee, need accounting information)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(employee, need information)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(employee, need information)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(creditor, need information)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(creditor, use information)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(creditor, need accounting information)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(creditor, use accounting information)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(waiter, need tips)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(creditor, need information)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(creditor, use information)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(creditor, need accounting information)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(creditor, use accounting information)