employee: report to work

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents other person
Weight: 0.69
, creditor
Weight: 0.64
, driver
Weight: 0.64
, officer
Weight: 0.63
Siblings office worker
Weight: 0.74
, construction worker
Weight: 0.74
, salesperson
Weight: 0.70
, receptionist
Weight: 0.69
, waiter
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
report to work 1.00
report to his boss 0.81
be at work 0.79
work 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(driver, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(employee, report to work)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(creditor, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(employee, report to work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(employee, report to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(creditor, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(employee, report to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(driver, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(employee, report to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(creditor, work)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(employee, report to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(driver, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(driver, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(employee, report to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(employee, report to work)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(creditor, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(employee, report to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(employee, report to work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(employee, report to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(employee, report to work)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(employee, report to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(employee, report to his boss)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(employee, report to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(employee, report to his boss)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(employee, report to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(employee, work)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(employee, report to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(employee, be at work)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(employee, report to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(employee, be at work)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(employee, report to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(employee, work)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(employee, report to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(employee, report to his boss)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(employee, report to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(employee, be at work)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(employee, report to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(employee, work)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(employee, report to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(employee, be at work)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(employee, report to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(employee, report to his boss)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(employee, report to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(employee, work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(employee, report to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(employee, report to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(employee, report to work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(employee, report to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(employee, report to work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(employee, report to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(creditor, work)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(employee, report to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(driver, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(employee, report to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(creditor, work)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(employee, report to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(driver, work)