employee: resist change in organization

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents other person
Weight: 0.69
, partner
Weight: 0.65
, creditor
Weight: 0.64
, officer
Weight: 0.63
Siblings office worker
Weight: 0.74
, construction worker
Weight: 0.74
, salesperson
Weight: 0.70
, receptionist
Weight: 0.69
, waiter
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
resist change in organization 1.00
resist change 0.91
resist use 0.84
resist change pdf 0.82
be important in organization 0.80
be important to organization 0.79
keep change 0.79
be resistant to organizational change 0.79
be afraid of change 0.77
have important to organization behavior 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, resist use)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(waiter, keep change)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(construction worker, resist use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(construction worker, resist use)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(waiter, keep change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(waiter, keep change)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(employee, resist change in organization)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(employee, resist change)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(employee, resist change)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(employee, resist change)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(employee, resist change)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(employee, have important to organization behavior)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(employee, be afraid of change)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(employee, be resistant to organizational change)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(employee, be important to organization)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(employee, be resistant to organizational change)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(employee, be resistant to organizational change)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(employee, be resistant to organizational change)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(employee, be important in organization)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(employee, be afraid of change)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(employee, have important to organization behavior)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(employee, be afraid of change)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(employee, be afraid of change)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(employee, be important to organization)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(employee, be important in organization)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(employee, have important to organization behavior)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(employee, be important to organization)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(employee, be important in organization)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important in organization)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to organization)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(employee, have important to organization behavior)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(employee, resist change in organization)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(employee, resist change in organization)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(construction worker, resist use)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(employee, resist change in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(waiter, keep change)