employee: stay

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents other person
Weight: 0.69
, partner
Weight: 0.65
, creditor
Weight: 0.64
, officer
Weight: 0.63
Siblings office worker
Weight: 0.74
, construction worker
Weight: 0.74
, salesperson
Weight: 0.70
, receptionist
Weight: 0.69
, waiter
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
stay 1.00
stay in company 0.86
stay in jobs 0.83
stay in relationships 0.83
keep change 0.80
leave buzzfeed 0.79
leave 0.79
leave work 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(partner, stay in relationships)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(employee, stay)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(employee, stay)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(partner, stay in relationships)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(employee, stay)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(partner, stay in relationships)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(employee, stay)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(waiter, keep change)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(partner, stay in relationships)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(employee, stay)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(employee, stay)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(employee, stay)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(waiter, keep change)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(waiter, keep change)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(employee, stay)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(employee, stay)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(employee, stay)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(employee, stay in jobs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(employee, stay)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(employee, leave work)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(employee, stay)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(employee, leave work)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(employee, stay)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(employee, leave work)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(employee, stay)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(employee, stay in jobs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(employee, stay)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(employee, stay in company)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(employee, stay)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(employee, stay in company)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(employee, stay)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(employee, stay in company)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(employee, stay)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(employee, stay in company)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(employee, stay)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(employee, leave work)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(employee, stay)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(employee, stay in jobs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(employee, stay)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(employee, stay in jobs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(employee, stay)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(employee, stay)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(employee, stay)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(employee, stay)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(employee, stay)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(employee, stay)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(partner, stay in relationships)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(employee, stay)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(waiter, keep change)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(employee, stay)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(partner, stay in relationships)