employee: stock shop shelve

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents other person
Weight: 0.69
, creditor
Weight: 0.64
, driver
Weight: 0.64
, officer
Weight: 0.63
Siblings office worker
Weight: 0.74
, construction worker
Weight: 0.74
, salesperson
Weight: 0.70
, receptionist
Weight: 0.69
, waiter
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
stock shop shelve 1.00
stock store shelve 0.98
be at shop 0.76
stock inventory item 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(employee, stock shop shelve)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(salesperson, be at shop)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(employee, stock shop shelve)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(salesperson, be at shop)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(salesperson, be at shop)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(employee, stock shop shelve)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(employee, stock shop shelve)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(employee, stock shop shelve)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(employee, stock store shelve)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(employee, stock shop shelve)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(employee, stock store shelve)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(employee, stock shop shelve)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(employee, stock store shelve)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(employee, stock shop shelve)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(employee, stock store shelve)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(employee, stock shop shelve)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(employee, stock inventory item)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(employee, stock shop shelve)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(employee, stock inventory item)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(employee, stock shop shelve)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(employee, stock inventory item)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(employee, stock shop shelve)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(employee, stock inventory item)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(employee, stock shop shelve)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(employee, stock shop shelve)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(employee, stock shop shelve)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(employee, stock shop shelve)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(employee, stock shop shelve)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(employee, stock shop shelve)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(salesperson, be at shop)