employee: wants to more money

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents other person
Weight: 0.69
, creditor
Weight: 0.64
, driver
Weight: 0.64
, officer
Weight: 0.63
Siblings office worker
Weight: 0.74
, construction worker
Weight: 0.74
, salesperson
Weight: 0.70
, receptionist
Weight: 0.69
, waiter
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
wants to more money 1.00
wants to have fun on job 0.77
wants to get raise 0.77
lend money to debters 0.77
wants to raise 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(creditor, lend money to debters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(employee, wants to more money)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(employee, wants to more money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(creditor, lend money to debters)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(employee, wants to more money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(creditor, lend money to debters)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(creditor, lend money to debters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(employee, wants to more money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(employee, wants to more money)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(employee, wants to more money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(employee, wants to more money)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(employee, wants to more money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(employee, wants to have fun on job)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(employee, wants to more money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(employee, wants to get raise)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(employee, wants to more money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(employee, wants to have fun on job)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(employee, wants to more money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(employee, wants to raise)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(employee, wants to more money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(employee, wants to get raise)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(employee, wants to more money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(employee, wants to raise)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(employee, wants to more money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(employee, wants to get raise)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(employee, wants to more money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(employee, wants to raise)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(employee, wants to more money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(employee, wants to raise)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(employee, wants to more money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(employee, wants to have fun on job)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(employee, wants to more money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(employee, wants to get raise)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(employee, wants to more money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(employee, wants to have fun on job)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(employee, wants to more money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(employee, wants to more money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(employee, wants to more money)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(employee, wants to more money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(employee, wants to more money)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(employee, wants to more money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(creditor, lend money to debters)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(employee, wants to more money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(creditor, lend money to debters)