employee: welcome hotel customer

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents other person
Weight: 0.69
, creditor
Weight: 0.64
, driver
Weight: 0.64
, officer
Weight: 0.63
Siblings office worker
Weight: 0.74
, construction worker
Weight: 0.74
, salesperson
Weight: 0.70
, receptionist
Weight: 0.69
, waiter
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
welcome hotel customer 1.00
serve customer in restaurant 0.83
bring food to customer 0.83
offer to customer 0.82
serve customer 0.79
thank customer for purchase 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(employee, welcome hotel customer)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(waiter, offer to customer)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(employee, welcome hotel customer)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(waiter, bring food to customer)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(employee, welcome hotel customer)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(waiter, serve customer)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(employee, welcome hotel customer)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(waiter, serve customer in restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(employee, welcome hotel customer)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(waiter, serve customer in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(waiter, serve customer in restaurant)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(employee, welcome hotel customer)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(waiter, bring food to customer)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(waiter, bring food to customer)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(employee, welcome hotel customer)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(waiter, serve customer)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(waiter, serve customer)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(employee, welcome hotel customer)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(waiter, offer to customer)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(waiter, offer to customer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(employee, welcome hotel customer)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(employee, welcome hotel customer)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(employee, welcome hotel customer)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(employee, thank customer for purchase)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(employee, welcome hotel customer)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(employee, thank customer for purchase)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(employee, welcome hotel customer)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(employee, thank customer for purchase)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(employee, welcome hotel customer)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(employee, thank customer for purchase)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(employee, welcome hotel customer)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(employee, welcome hotel customer)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(employee, welcome hotel customer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(employee, welcome hotel customer)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(employee, welcome hotel customer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(employee, welcome hotel customer)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(waiter, serve customer in restaurant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(employee, welcome hotel customer)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(waiter, serve customer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(employee, welcome hotel customer)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(waiter, bring food to customer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(employee, welcome hotel customer)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(waiter, offer to customer)