employee: work for employer

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents other person
Weight: 0.69
, creditor
Weight: 0.64
, driver
Weight: 0.64
, officer
Weight: 0.63
Siblings office worker
Weight: 0.74
, construction worker
Weight: 0.74
, salesperson
Weight: 0.70
, receptionist
Weight: 0.69
, waiter
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
work for employer 1.00
demand wage from his employer 0.86
be at work 0.76
work 0.76
has start fight at workplace party 0.76
page other employee 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(driver, work)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(employee, work for employer)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(creditor, work)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(employee, work for employer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(creditor, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(driver, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(creditor, work)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(driver, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(receptionist, page other employee)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(driver, work)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(employee, work for employer)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(creditor, work)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(employee, work for employer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(receptionist, page other employee)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(receptionist, page other employee)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(employee, work for employer)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(employee, demand wage from his employer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(employee, demand wage from his employer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(employee, has start fight at workplace party)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(employee, has start fight at workplace party)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(employee, has start fight at workplace party)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(employee, demand wage from his employer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(employee, work)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(employee, be at work)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(employee, be at work)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(employee, work)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(employee, be at work)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(employee, work)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(employee, demand wage from his employer)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(employee, be at work)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(employee, work)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(employee, has start fight at workplace party)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, work for employer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(employee, work for employer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(creditor, work)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(driver, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(receptionist, page other employee)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(creditor, work)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(employee, work for employer)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(driver, work)