employer: be important to business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents institution
Weight: 0.65
, person
Weight: 0.64
, customer
Weight: 0.63
, payment
Weight: 0.63
Siblings corporation
Weight: 0.64
, newspaper
Weight: 0.61
, plaintiff
Weight: 0.60
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.55
, worker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to business 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(customer, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(employer, be important to business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(employer, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(customer, be important to business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(employer, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(customer, be important to business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(customer, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(employer, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(employer, be important to business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(employer, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(employer, be important to business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(employer, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(employer, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(employer, be important to business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(employer, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(employer, be important to business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(employer, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(customer, be important to business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(employer, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(customer, be important to business)