employer: benefit from trade unions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents institution
Weight: 0.65
, person
Weight: 0.64
, customer
Weight: 0.63
, payment
Weight: 0.63
Siblings corporation
Weight: 0.64
, newspaper
Weight: 0.61
, plaintiff
Weight: 0.60
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.55
, worker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
benefit from trade unions 1.00
hate unions 0.89
dislike unions 0.88
fear unions 0.87
be afraid of unions 0.87
resist unions 0.86
be less likely unions are 0.85
being involved in labor market 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(employer, benefit from trade unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(employer, benefit from trade unions)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(employer, benefit from trade unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(employer, be afraid of unions)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(employer, benefit from trade unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(employer, be afraid of unions)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(employer, benefit from trade unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(employer, be afraid of unions)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(employer, benefit from trade unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(employer, be afraid of unions)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(employer, benefit from trade unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(employer, be less likely unions are)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(employer, benefit from trade unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(employer, be less likely unions are)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(employer, benefit from trade unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(employer, being involved in labor market)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(employer, benefit from trade unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(employer, be less likely unions are)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(employer, benefit from trade unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(employer, be less likely unions are)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(employer, benefit from trade unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(employer, being involved in labor market)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(employer, benefit from trade unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(employer, being involved in labor market)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(employer, benefit from trade unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(employer, being involved in labor market)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(employer, benefit from trade unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(employer, benefit from trade unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(employer, benefit from trade unions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(employer, benefit from trade unions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(employer, benefit from trade unions)