employer: check credit

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents institution
Weight: 0.65
, person
Weight: 0.64
, customer
Weight: 0.63
, payment
Weight: 0.63
Siblings corporation
Weight: 0.64
, newspaper
Weight: 0.61
, plaintiff
Weight: 0.60
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.55
, worker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
check credit 1.00
need credit check 0.98
do credit check 0.98
check credit scores 0.93
do credit checks 0.92
check credit reports 0.91
run credit checks on employees 0.87
do credit checks in canada 0.87
do credit check on job candidates 0.85
keep check 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(employer, check credit)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(employer, check credit)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(employer, check credit)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(employer, do credit check)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(employer, check credit)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(employer, do credit check)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(employer, check credit)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(employer, do credit check)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(employer, check credit)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(employer, do credit check)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(employer, check credit)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(employer, do credit checks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(employer, check credit)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(employer, do credit checks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(employer, check credit)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(employer, do credit checks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(employer, check credit)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(employer, do credit checks in canada)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(employer, check credit)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(employer, do credit checks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(employer, check credit)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(employer, do credit checks in canada)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(employer, check credit)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(employer, do credit checks in canada)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(employer, check credit)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(employer, do credit checks in canada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(employer, check credit)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(employer, check credit)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(employer, check credit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(employer, check credit)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(employer, check credit)