employer: do credit check

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents institution
Weight: 0.65
, person
Weight: 0.64
, customer
Weight: 0.63
, payment
Weight: 0.63
Siblings corporation
Weight: 0.64
, newspaper
Weight: 0.61
, plaintiff
Weight: 0.60
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.55
, worker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
do credit check 1.00
need credit check 0.98
check credit 0.98
do credit checks 0.93
check credit scores 0.92
check credit reports 0.89
do credit checks in canada 0.89
do credit check on job candidates 0.89
run credit checks on employees 0.87
keep check 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(employer, do credit check)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(employer, do credit check)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(employer, do credit check)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(employer, check credit)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(employer, do credit check)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(employer, check credit)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(employer, do credit check)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(employer, do credit checks)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(employer, do credit check)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(employer, check credit)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(employer, do credit check)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(employer, check credit)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(employer, do credit check)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(employer, do credit checks)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(employer, do credit check)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(employer, do credit checks in canada)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(employer, do credit check)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(employer, do credit checks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(employer, do credit check)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(employer, do credit checks)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(employer, do credit check)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(employer, do credit checks in canada)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(employer, do credit check)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(employer, do credit checks in canada)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(employer, do credit check)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(employer, do credit checks in canada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(employer, do credit check)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(employer, do credit check)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(employer, do credit check)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(employer, do credit check)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(employer, do credit check)