employer: do credit checks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents institution
Weight: 0.65
, person
Weight: 0.64
, customer
Weight: 0.63
, payment
Weight: 0.63
Siblings corporation
Weight: 0.64
, newspaper
Weight: 0.61
, plaintiff
Weight: 0.60
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.55
, worker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
do credit checks 1.00
do credit check 0.93
run credit checks on employees 0.92
need credit check 0.92
check credit 0.92
do credit checks in canada 0.92
check credit scores 0.88
do reference checks 0.86
check credit reports 0.86
do credit check on job candidates 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(employer, do credit checks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(employer, do credit checks)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(employer, do credit checks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(employer, do credit check)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(employer, do credit checks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(employer, check credit)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(employer, do credit checks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(employer, do credit check)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(employer, do credit checks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(employer, check credit)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(employer, do credit checks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(employer, do credit checks in canada)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(employer, do credit checks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(employer, do credit check)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(employer, do credit checks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(employer, do credit check)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(employer, do credit checks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(employer, check credit)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(employer, do credit checks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(employer, check credit)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(employer, do credit checks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(employer, do credit checks in canada)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(employer, do credit checks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(employer, do credit checks in canada)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(employer, do credit checks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(employer, do credit checks in canada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(employer, do credit checks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(employer, do credit checks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(employer, do credit checks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(employer, do credit checks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(employer, do credit checks)