enamel: be harder than cementum

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.61
, paint
Weight: 0.57
, substance
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.55
, metal
Weight: 0.51
Siblings titanium dioxide
Weight: 0.35
, varnish
Weight: 0.34
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.34
, magnesium oxide
Weight: 0.34
, shellac
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harder than cementum 1.00
be harder than dentin 0.89
be harder than bone 0.88
be stronger than bone 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(enamel, be harder than cementum)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(enamel, be harder than cementum)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(enamel, be harder than cementum)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(enamel, be stronger than bone)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(enamel, be harder than cementum)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(enamel, be stronger than bone)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(enamel, be harder than cementum)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(enamel, be stronger than bone)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(enamel, be harder than cementum)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(enamel, be stronger than bone)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(enamel, be harder than cementum)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(enamel, be harder than bone)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(enamel, be harder than cementum)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(enamel, be harder than bone)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(enamel, be harder than cementum)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(enamel, be harder than bone)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(enamel, be harder than cementum)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(enamel, be harder than bone)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(enamel, be harder than cementum)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(enamel, be harder than dentin)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(enamel, be harder than cementum)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(enamel, be harder than dentin)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(enamel, be harder than cementum)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(enamel, be harder than dentin)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(enamel, be harder than cementum)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(enamel, be harder than dentin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(enamel, be harder than cementum)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(enamel, be harder than cementum)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(enamel, be harder than cementum)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(enamel, be harder than cementum)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(enamel, be harder than cementum)